refers to the landmark case decided through the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Right here’s a brief overview:

Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life and also the importance of maintaining regulation and order in society.

116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as set forth would not utilize, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, somewhat he continues to be acquitted in the criminal charges based on evidence and it is actually well-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted inside the criminal case, then on this extremely charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for your post because acquittal for all long run purposes. The aforesaid proposition has actually been established at naught through the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case in the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.

Deterrence: The fear of severe penalties, such as capital punishment, is meant to discourage likely criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is critical in reducing the incidence of intentional killings.

Because of their position between the two main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of legislation.

The case addresses An array of issues which include, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation on the right to life.

ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually effectively-settled that while taking into consideration the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should consider the benefit of all the eligible candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of eligible candidates who're found to generally be most meritorious among them. Since the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked via the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of your respondent department.

There are numerous circumstances where death was never meant – even more where those nominated during the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of a human being is often a tragic event. However the death of any residing being isn't any considerably less a tragic event.

This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying 10 case study on law of contract exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based around the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more

two. I have read the learned counsel for your parties and also figured out DPG at size, perused the record and noticed that:-

Using keywords effectively is also important. Contemplate using synonyms and variations of your keywords to make sure you seize all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property might also sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or simply to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)

one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty from the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension might be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set via the government.